EVIDENCE 2: The Most Brutal and Barbaric Case of Digital Tampering Ever Done! from cyanide – shristi dasgupta and soumi ghosh Watch Video

⏲ Duration: 6:14
👁 View: 15K times
✓ Published: 06-Apr-2024

Description:
The Most Brutal and Barbaric Case of Digital Tampering Ever: Unveiling the Truth Behind Café Olivier CCTV Footage Manipulation by Indonesian Police Officer<br/><br/><br/>EVIDENCE 2:<br/>CUTTING CCTV VIDEO FILE 9 INTO 2 PARTS AND PERFORMING DOWNSCALING ON THE FIRST SEGMENT<br/>Muhammad Nuh Al-Azhar and Christopher Hariman Rianto, coordinated by Krishna Murti, divided CCTV video 9 into two segments:<br/><br/>Segment 1: 15:35 – 16:59 Local Time<br/>The frame dimension was reduced to 960 x 576 px, and the frame rate was reduced to 10 frames per second. In this segment, it was necessary to observe the color of coffee served by Agus Triono at table 54 at 16:24:18 Local Time, yet Muhammad Nuh Al-Azhar blurred it instead.<br/><br/>Segment 2: 16:59 – 18:25 Local Time<br/>Frame dimension remained full high definition (FHD, 1920x1080 px), and the frame rate remained at 25 frames per second. However, it was here where the color of the remaining coffee that Mirna Salihin drank, taken by Sari at 17:21:20 Local Time, was observed.<br/><br/>Analysis<br/>In Segment 1, where the frame dimension was reduced and the frame rate was lowered, the deliberate blurring of the coffee served by Agus Triono at table 54 at 16:24:18 Local Time had significant consequences. This manipulation obscured crucial details that could have been pertinent to the investigation. Deliberately altering the footage in this manner raised suspicions of tampering or concealment of evidence.<br/><br/>Moving to Segment 2, where the frame dimension remained high definition and the frame rate was maintained at 25 frame per second, the deliberate manipulation of the coffee color consumed by Mirna Salihin becomed apparent. By maintaining the integrity of this segment while altering the previous one, the forensic experts created a stark contrast that potentially mislead the judges.<br/><br/>The non-equivalent comparison of coffee colors between the two segments, one downscaled and the other original, led to erroneous conclusions. This manipulation introduced inaccuracies in the analysis, distorting the true representation of events. The discrepancy in coffee colors identified by the forensic experts become a crucial point of contention, casting doubt on the validity of the entire forensic process.<br/><br/>The deliberate manipulation of the coffee color in the video footage posed significant challenges for toxicological analysis. Toxicologists, Nursamran Subandi and I Made Agus Gelgel, heavily relied on visual evidence to assess the presence of toxins, such as cyanide, in substances like coffee. However, when the color of the coffee was tampered with, toxicologists drawn inaccurate conclusions. For instance, if the manipulated footage portrayed the coffee as a different color than it actually was, toxicologists might misinterpreted the data and wrongly diagnosed the presence of toxins. This manipulation undermined the accuracy and reliability of the toxicological analysis, casting doubt on the validity of the findings and complicating the judicial process.<br/>